Independent summaries of the discussions, with citations to the public transcripts. Statements describe progress at the meeting date.
Meeting date: 2026-10-21 · Summary published: 2026-10-27 · Transcript reviewed: 2026-10-27.
Transaction-key privacy and Carrot
Participants distinguished privacy risks from voluntarily sharing transaction keys in existing Monero from a Carrot design concern involving information automatically available to recipients. Discussion focused on two-output transactions, change identification, and preserving payment-proof functionality. Alternatives involved scanning costs, Janus protection and self-send proofs; the exchange did not establish a finalized remedy. Meeting log, 17:06–17:42 UTC
FCMP++ integration and audits
Developers reported that mx25519 had merged and upstream consensus integration proposals were ready for review. Quotes were being sought for phases 2 and 3 integration audits, while the Least Authority circuit-and-gadgets audit continued. Multisig and Carrot transaction proofs remained in progress. Meeting log, 17:45–17:54 UTC
Stressnet and practical meaning
A v3.1 stressnet release was planned with accumulated fixes, including reopening wallets in the GUI. These were development and test-network updates, not an announcement of mainnet activation. For readers, the key follow-up is the resolution of Carrot design questions and completion of integration review and audits. Meeting log, 17:56–17:57 UTC
Meeting date: 2026-10-14 · Summary published: 2026-10-27 · Transcript reviewed: 2026-10-27.
FCMP++ readiness
Integration proposals were ready for another review after comments had been addressed. Unlock-time handling was being finalized before requesting phases 2 and 3 audit quotes. Developers still described mx25519 integration as an activation bottleneck, although relicensing had moved the discussion forward. Multisig work and a second circuit-and-gadgets audit continued. Meeting log, 17:10–17:20 UTC
Stressnet testing
Participants reported a functioning stressnet but cautioned that stress testing had been limited. Transaction-relay changes still needed log review. This was a progress report, not evidence that the network upgrade was ready for production. Meeting log, 17:21–17:24 UTC
Eclipse-resistance proposals
Rucknium presented peer-selection changes aimed at the Nyx eclipse attack and was examining protection for newly started nodes. Discussion compared larger peer lists with bucketed alternatives and considered how adversaries can populate unchecked peers. The meeting exposed design trade-offs rather than announcing a deployed defense; operators should distinguish research proposals from protections in tagged releases. Meeting log, 17:03–17:05 and 17:26–17:35 UTC